Revisiting My First Goal for 2009

January 5, 2009 · 14 comments

I’m on my way to achieving at least one of my goals.

GOALS VS. OBJECTIVES

But before I talk about that, I wanted to address a point my fiancee brought up about “goals” and “objectives.”  She says “goals” are supposed to be generalized while “objectives” are supposed to be specific.  Perhaps that’s because she works in an education environment and that’s how they use those two terms.  Of course, if I did that, how could I tell you all about SMART goals?  So I went to another authority, the dictionary.  Merriam-Webster’s definitions of goals and objectives both say about the same thing:  the end/something toward which effort is directed.

DECISIONS, DECISIONS

As I promised, I did pick up a copy of The Elements of Style, so that I could re-read it.  And I didn’t wait until the weekend, instead picking it up on New Year’s Day.  It actually ended up being a harder task than I anticipated.  My running late to a New Year’s luncheon didn’t help any, but here were some of the “problems” I had at the Borders at Windward Mall:

photo1First, another grammar book I enjoyed, Eats, Shoots & Leaves (by Lynne Truss, $25) jumped out at me as I wandered the shelves.  “Maybe I should get it?” I suggested to my cousin.  But then I reasoned that I had already publicly committed to buying The Elements of Style.  By the way, that internal struggle took 15 minutes to settle.  In the end, I think the only reason I decided not to buy the Truss book is that I didn’t want to spend $25.  I guess it’s good to be parsimonious.

With that issue behind me, I had to choose between multiple copies of The Elements of Style (all of them by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White).

photo2There was the paperback for $9.95.  But I’m not a big fan of paperbacks, preferring hardcover books instead.  And, I had just seen a paperback on Amazon for $3, so it seemed a bit of a premium to pay just to not have to wait.

photo3Then there was the hardcover version of the paperback for $15.95.  It was the exact same book, with the same cover design, just being sold for $6 more for the hardcover.  It still didn’t “call” to me.

photo4Next up was an illustrated hardcover for $16.  Now this was more like it!  I thought this might be the one, until…

photo5My eyes caught a look at the unassuming black hardcover near it.  The 50th anniversary edition cost $19.95, but as soon as I saw it, I grabbed it and secured it under my arms.  I had a winner and I wasn’t going to risk anyone else taking it.  And perhaps I’m not as frugal as I thought I was.

CHAPTER 1

I just finished reading Chapter 1 last night.  Not that the book is long:  105 pages, including the index.  But the material can be quite dense.  And if you’re still with me after a post like this, you must really be interested in what I write, or a nerd.

Whatever the reason, you might appreciate this:  I hid two “easter eggs” of sorts, one each in yesterday’s and today’s posts.  First, I referred to Strunk as William Strunk Jr. today.  Second, in writing about my Where’s George? addiction, I included this line:

Only by putting it back into circulation and getting it into others’s hands can we increase our chances that someone else will log the bill and we will increase our George Scores.

These are not mistakes. In fact, I deliberately put them there so someone would comment.  In the case of “Strunk Jr.,” we need only look at the part of Rule 3 that says, “Although…Jr., has commonly been regarded as parenthetic, logic suggests that it is, in fact, restrictive and therefore not in need of a comma.”  In the case of “others’s,” Rule 1 is absolutely clear, “Form the possessive singular of nouns by adding ‘s.  Follow this rule whatever the final consonant.”

Now wasn’t that fun?  Honestly, I think these two particular examples are more a matter of personal preference and less so a rule.  But if someone chooses to follow them as stated, they definitely aren’t wrong.  I can’t wait to get back to the reading.

Mahalo!

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

mahalo, Sandie!
...& the Walsh and Bernstein titles go on my list of things to read before I die...
A well-intentioned person gave me a copy of "Meditations for Women Who Do Too Much." It was promptly covered with a new dust-jacket, "Medications for Women Who Do Too Much."

Not to belabor the point but the way I thought about the "other/others" thing was :

You and I speak to one another, i.e., each other, and share each other's problems, but we have concern about the problems of others, others' problems being so much more compelling!

Was that clear?

And my philosophy is, there are no errors if one is understood, which you were! And in one's own blog, one can use whatever system one wants if one is consistent.

Finally, let me recommend Bill Walsh's "The Elephants of Style" and "Lapsing into a Comma." He is a Washington Post copyeditor. Also, try to track down the out-of-print "The Careful Writer," by Theodore Bernstein. All much more informative and entertaining than EofS or E,S&L!

You write:
...In the case of “others’s,” Rule 1 is absolutely clear, “Form the possessive singular of nouns by adding ’s. Follow this rule whatever the final consonant.”...

I would beg to differ. "Others" is a plural and the possessive (plural) you are using would be "others' hands." (Into the hands of others; if only to one other person, it would be into the hands of another.)

S&W is a good reference, but there are really so few absolutes, and so much style and usage to consder:
Gates' fortune...Gates's fortune...depends on whether you are using AP style or Chicago.

Interesting stuff.

And note that for E,S&L, she actually violates some of her own rules (which are British anyway -- another of the great style problems, Brit. vs. Am. English).

Keep it up. I'm adding you to my blog linnks.

I think the advice of your professor about choosing one system was a good one. Unless, of course, you work at a place that requires one or the other.

But even where I work, for the most part, you can use the Chicago Manual of Style, The Associated Press Stylebook, The Redbook, or the Bluebook. Where it gets sticky is citing legal sources. Then it depends on the audience.

PUBA for ever.

Aloha,

Dan
dkseto.wordpress.com
www.twitter.com/danseto

laurelle: Dator's class does sound cool. He still thinks he's 22 and a hippie. We might have to schedule a nerd meet-up to discuss these important matters. It has been a while.

quilly: You're right! Thank you for your interest and readership, all the way to the end. I think The Elements of Style are about writing in a general sense. I had to use MLA from high school through undergraduate. I only switched to APA during grad school. One of my professors put it succinctly, "Just use one of the systems and you'll be fine except for some nuances."

Pedant. And I mean it with admiration. Gold star for you. You may now go wash your hands 100 times. I'll be back when I'm done.

Love the mental pic of you in the bookstore snapping pix of each book!

M'kay, so I have not gotten around to looking this one up:

"each others's" or "each other's"?

They read each other's posts. (2 people?)
They read each others's posts. (3+ people?)

along the same lines:
Everyone read everyone else's (or "elses's"?) answers.
etc.

I like browsing Fowler's Modern English and some other pedant bibles. I do have Strunk & White on my bookshelf. And I tossed Chicago Manual of Style in the conf room as I wanted (it available) to influence other writers. Mostly use them to convince others that they should NOT write sentences about the project "effecting" a specific population and the grant "affecting" change. Annoying it, I assume.

btw, Jim Dator said he is considering offering a WI course with all WI assignments in texting. srsly. How kewl is that? We are dinosaurs, we are!

Perhaps one someone stayed with you all the way to the end of that post because, as an author, she is actually interested in the subject and what you have to say. Or, she could just be polite.

In my short stint as an editorial assistant I learned that The Chicago Manual of Style is actually the preferred source of most editors. Reading that isn't really an option. It is most definitely a reference book.

sandie: Wow, thanks for visiting and adding me to your blogroll! I agree that a lot of this is more preference by one system over the other. Grad school was problematic at times because I had to learn APA and unlearn MLA, yet that's what I had used from intermediate. And, just when I thought I was finally getting a handle on all of this, you point out an error of mine. I shall have to redouble my efforts...

Hehe. I never got around to reading Eats, Shoots and Leaves but I have had that on my @Someday list for a very, very long time

I don't work much with our lawyers, so I guess I'm free to use whatever system I choose. My ultimate pedantic plan is to re-read The Elements of Style, then re-read Eats, Shoot & Leaves, then I might pickup and learn the AP system, just to try something new. And to feel journalistic.

Woohoo, another PUBAn! I'm going to send you an invite to PUBA-Land Online, our Ning site for PUBA.

laurelle: Hilarious! It wasn't re-written in said person's blood, was it? That's 2 votes for Walsh and Bernstein, so I'd better go look for it.

sandie: Yes, that was clear. Thanks again for pointing it out. I'll have to add these recommendations to my @Someday/Maybe list.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] http://capsun.org/2009/01/05/revisiting-my-first-goal-for-2009/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Crayon Box SurveyIn the spotlightBTT X2 and a day lateMommies who think – Mommies Who Drink [...]

Previous post:

Next post: