Protecting President Bush?

February 16, 2009 · 6 comments

Photo: whitehouse.gov

Photo: whitehouse.gov

In honor of President’s Day, I’m going to talk about our most recent President, George Walker Bush.  On January 20, Inauguration Day 2009, I was one of the millions of people who was ecstatic to see former President Bush leave Washington, D.C.  As with many of his predecessors, he left the U. S. Capitol aboard a helicopter known to most of us as Marine One and then left Andrews Air Force Base aboard the jet we know as Air Force One.  Note that both the helicopter and plane couldn’t be designated as such because he was no longer POTUS, President of the United States.  You can see those great moments on YouTube:  helicopter and plane.

But soon after watching the coverage, my thoughts began to drift toward President Bush’s safety. You see, he will be the first former President to have his Secret Service protection limited to ten years after leaving office.  That’s because Congress, during President Clinton’s term, changed the law granting lifetime protection for former Presidents and their families.  You don’t have to take my word for it, it’s codified as 18 USC 3056. For the non-legal types, that’s Title 18 of the United States Code, §3056.

I think the general sentiment at the time was that it was too costly to provide lifetime protection.  However, President Bush and his successors will still receive their federal pensions; official travel, office, and staff expenses; and the National Archives and Records Administration will maintain their presidential libraries after they are built.  So, I do wonder how much we actually save.

But I digress.

President Bush left office with one of the lowest approval ratings in history – a sign of his unpopularity, for sure.  But what about all those terrorists or terrorist-supporting countries that he went after in applying the Bush Doctrine of preventive war?  While I vehemently disagreed with him on many, if not most, policy issues, I would never wish any harm upon him, or his family for that matter.  But I don’t think other people out there are as sane as I am.

My general concern is this:  I truly believe Congress needs to reconsider this law and the lifetime protection, not just for President Bush’s safety, but also for the national security of the United States.  What if something happened to President Bush after his Secret Service protection ended?  Could you imagine the difficult diplomatic situation we might be in if something were to happen to him?  Countries have been embroiled in war because of assassinations.

Remember, former presidents have high security clearance and access to sensitive information that normal citizens do not.  In the wrong hands, that kind of information could be disastrous, as happened when Captain Jean-Luc Picard became Locutus of Borg.

As well-intentioned as this legislation was, I think security should  be more important than saving some money.  If we can afford an almost $800 billion stimulus, surely we can afford several million dollars to avoid an endless number of potential highly undesirable scenarios with a former president.

Granted, if President Bush is as much a home-body as he was during his presidency, this may all be an academic discussion.  Nonetheless, this is a real situation that we should plan for now.  We have about 9 years, 11 months left, but let’s not put it off until it’s too late.

Mahalo!

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Not to worry, Capsun, the law was changed because many acknowledged that former POTUSes have a vastly different financial future upon leaving office, as compared to those from previous eras. Basically, they make enough money to be able to afford their own security. I'm sure that, in the highly unlikely event that a former POTUS is financially unable to do so, there will be assistance offered by all and sundry.

quilly: Maybe we should start the campaign for the Barack H. Obama Presidential Library and Political Science Program at the University of Hawaii now. We'd have 7.5 years left if he wins re-election.

Thom: Glad I could share new information with you. You've confirmed what I've hoped: that part of my blog is educational.

Kahi: Mahalo for the first comment. I *hope* others agree with you and Congress changes the law. If they don't, pursuant to current law, he will lose his protection after 10 years.

Travis: Wow, your first comment, and you agree with me. I'm glad I finally wrote on something you could agree/support as I do.

laurelle: Good point. It never occurred to me that they could hire their own security detail.

I agree completely regarding lifetime Secret Service protection. Presidents must be able to exercise their powers in office - and their privileges once retired from office, as you point out - without fear of harm from terrorists, fanatics, and crazies.

As you know, I disagree passionately with President Obama on many issues. Nonetheless, I want him to be able to govern based on what he thinks is right, not based on what may keep him safe. Congress should reinstate lifetime Secret Service protection for President Bush, President Obama, and all future presidents.

Hi Caps,
I do believe that Bush 43 will be protected forever because prior to this law, ex-president's, their spouses, AND children got lifetime secret service protection. So "W" will continue to be watched. His daughters will not have that protection. The Obama's will not either. That could be a problem.

When I first read the headline in Google Reader I thought "here we go"
Capsun I'm truly amazed you would even think such a thing but I'm certainly glad you did. One reason I like this blog is I didn't even know that that law was in place and I have learned something new today. I'm glad that you put your disdain for President Bush aside and agree that our national security is of great importance, and protecting an ex-president is part of that and his/her protection should be granted for his/her lifetime. What I don't understand is why, if it was passed during Clintons tenure, he wasn't the first to have this bestowed upon him. Oh wait...we are talking the Clinton Administration...never mind! Whatever was I thinking?

What I look forward to my friend, is at least 4 years of constantly reminding you of January 20, 2009 and how you felt that day. You see it's going to start, I understand, Tuesday, February 17, 2009 when this great nation becomes $800 billion dollars more in debt. Change you say? Food for thought: Obama kept saying that he was going to give the Senate and House 5 days at least to review the bills...this was shoved down their throats and they had less the 24 hours. Change you say? Touche'

You are right. I did not appreciate this man as President, but I would hate to have this law repealed only after it is proven to have been a bad idea.

I think some of the other things might better be limited, saving us even more money in the long run. Uhm, NOT the Presidential libraries because there's a good chance Obama's might be HERE.

Oh wait, I didn't really say that out loud, didI? ;)

Previous post:

Next post: