You be the Judge

March 20, 2009 · 10 comments

Last week, one of my co-workers emailed a bunch of us this video of Milton singing “The Man Song”:

So what did you think of it? If not at least a little humorous, the emasculating overtones are amusing.  But then I got to thinking, I just received this on my work email account – at work, at a government agency.  I don’t know what kind of acceptable use policy your job has, but as a State employee my usage is governed by State law, Administrative rules, and agency policies and procedures.

I sent this reply to my co-worker and everyone on the email distribution list:

Aloha e [REDACTED]

I think it’s quite apropos that you sent this email on the same day the [REDACTED] Computer and Internet Policy was distributed to [REDACTED].  Here are some points for all of us to keep in mind, from the policy:

  • E-mail system [is]…to be used for official company business only… {paragraph 1}
  • The agency specifically prohibits…access in ways that are offensive to others… {paragraph 2}
  • Users are banned from displaying…information that is sexually explicit, fraudulent, profane, obscene, defamatory…or any harassment or shows disrespect…. {paragraph3}
  • Employees are expected to conduct themselves in a professional manner…when composing and transmitting electronic communications {paragraph 4}
  • …e-mail messages and other use of the agency’s computers are not confidential… {paragraph 7}

Several of us have discussed these sorts of email forwards with you before, discouraging you from sending them.  Remember your RAPE/SHAFT/SCREW/AIDS/HERPES email of February 20?  For your sake and that of our agency, I hope going forward you will be more judicious in what you send out, and to whom.

While I don’t personally find this attachment offensive, I’m certain some would find it “obscene” or “defamatory.”  Perhaps I’m the only one willing to speak up about it.  Surely the high proportion of females in [REDACTED] has not been lost on you?  In my opinion, you really shouldn’t be sending these from your [REDACTED] address – period!  [REDACTED] uses this as his guide:  “Would I feel comfortable seeing this on the front page of the newspaper?”  I use this as my guide:  “How would I explain this to the Auditor?”  If you absolutely must share such information in the future, I highly encourage you to do so with your personal email.

And to make it absolutely clear, DO NOT SEND SUCH EMAILS TO ME.  I’m not asking you, I’m telling you.  In the on-going enforcement of the new policy, you have put *all of us* in jeopardy of violating it because we are possessing such material, through no fault of our own, but rather what I consider a large error in judgment on your part.

Mahalo, Capsun

So, you be the judge:  was I too harsh? I was not personally offended by this and I even chuckled.  But work email should be used for work, right?  I do have a personal email account and this co-worker has sent me things to that personal email account from his personal email account.  So I think my message was received.

Could you imagine what my email would have said if I *were* offended?

Mahalo!

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Nancy: I can't believe I forgot to bring that up!

Pokinatcha: Mahalo for stopping by and commenting. I completely agree, that's why I sent that email.

Sid: Thanks. And it doesn't take much extra effort, but can really avoid big problems.

quilly: A CYA mentality in government - who knew? ;-) Good point about this possibly negatively impacting one's employment.

Thom: Mahalo for helping me see the big picture and the other side of the argument. I'm so impressed, your entire comment will be on today's Props and Slops.

Anna: Thanks! One thing that may have been left out of that post is that I get along fine with that co-worker and my efforts came as part of tough love, and not vengeance.

Better they hear it from you than the auditor.

I'm sort of torn on this issue. I tend to blame our society as a whole because all it takes is one person to get offended by such and email and the content it contains and they go and either complain to the company or go to an attorney to sue. So companies, including the state and federal governments have had to set guidelines to not accept this kind of email and make work just a work place where people cannot just let loose for a couple of minutes a day and send this kind of silly email out.

However, on the other end of the spectrum there are those in an office situation, that don't use common sense and judgment and send out much raunchier emails, porn and sex, during work hours that I don't think should be sent out during that time and shouldn't be allowed to be sent using company email.

It's all a common sense issue. I would have gotten your response I would have just taken you off the mailing list. Period over and out. My emailing list when I send out emails, if people don't like it, hopefully they will tell me so I can use the delete button. I just think that companies have gone to far, or have been pushed to go to these lengths to have to prohibit such emailing at work.

Where does it ever end? Society as a whole has gotten way out of hand with their "rights" and we as a society have permitted it. Frivilous law suits have been a major cause and we allow them to proceed.

Since I work at "that other agency" alluded to in comment one, I'd say you made a wise choice in covering your ass bases. I also think you tendered a threat and, were I one of your co-workers, I don't believe I'd send you any non-work related email, period. Still, in the long run it is better to be left out of the current office joke than to be left out on the street without a job because you sent or accepted something potentially actionable.

I think it's a good response, I always keep my work and personal emails separated as well.

I don't think so. I know someone who also works for the gov't. When a mutual friend sent out emails that weren't gov't related to his work email, he sent out an email stating that his personal email be used.
It's good to have that on record if it were ever to come back to you, too!

I would think anyone who has read the newspaper will recall the embarrassing episode at another state agency and not want to go that route ...

Trackbacks

  1. [...] following video was posted by Capsun You be the Judge Mar 20th, 2009 by Capsun. Here is the [...]

Previous post:

Next post: